Camille @ 0069

Saw her today, had a nice experience, looks like pictures. Bbj, daty was on the table, She is very low volume.Pictures are a real representation of her, nice set of big boobs. Very eager to please and accommodating. Overall a pleasant experience.

0069 - Legendary phone number

I had the pleasure of seeing her today as well. Really a nice lady. Condo is clean and so was she. Her pics are really her and they are recent. Gorgeous boobs.

How was her face? Was she bigger than pictures show?

Where does one find this Camille? Is this her? https://www.leolist.cc/personals/fe...um_gfe_experience_sophisticated_milf-10655857 (no phone on that ad)

RobBC said: Where does one find this Camille? Is this her? https://www.leolist.cc/personals/fe...um_gfe_experience_sophisticated_milf-10655857 (no phone on that ad) Click to expand... Yep... Thats the one. She really needs to figure out her phone system And yes a pretty Face (YMMV) and Boobs are what you see in her photos. I was only there for a short 10 min chat.

Nikotr said: Saw her today, had a nice experience, looks like pictures. Bbj, daty was on the table, She is very low volume.Pictures are a real representation of her, nice set of big boobs. Very eager to please and accommodating. Overall a pleasant experience. Click to expand... Hi! how can I contact her, I can't find her ad to book with her. Could you please tell us more how is was with her, the connection , if he really enjoys it ? thanks

EthanS95 said: Could you please tell us more how is was with her, the connection , if she really enjoys it ? thanks Click to expand... Exactly. Sounds like a very mid experience from where I'm standing. This is the only review of Camille from someone with multiple posts and honestly, I don't know what to make of it. It's his only review too; the rest of his posts are questions. I'm curious but I won't risk seeing someone for an hour (that's her minimum) unless someone tells me that she blew their socks off.

Robert Audley said: Exactly. Sounds like a very mid experience from where I'm standing. This is the only review of Camille from someone with multiple posts and honestly, I don't know what to make of it. It's his only review too; the rest of his posts are questions. I'm curious but I won't risk seeing someone for an hour (that's her minimum) unless someone tells me that she blew their socks off. Click to expand... I did see her, she’s transactional. Not a fiery spirit, and a concealed emotional depth. It was okay, definitely expensive, and as always risque.

Dundas said: I did see her, she’s transactional. Not a fiery spirit, and a concealed emotional depth. It was okay, definitely expensive, and as always risque. Click to expand... Thank you for this. You saved me five brown ones. I owe you.

Dundas said: I did see her, she’s transactional. Not a fiery spirit, and a concealed emotional depth. It was okay Click to expand... Sounds a bit cryptic. Could you elaborate a bit more?

vazimollo said: Sounds a bit cryptic. Could you elaborate a bit more? Click to expand... check out her pics, banking on breast size to win you over, heavy set girl (advertised as MILF), read into it what you will, she’s nice enough, a Mom spirit pervades, not sure why the marriage relationship dissolved but it is the case…which is more than I need to know, some guys just want the sex, without the palpable emotional baggage….if the baggage doesn’t weigh you down, you’ll likely enjoy yourself, don’t expect anything lurid or cheap, she aims to please, but aims low…

Dundas said: check out her pics, banking on breast size to win you over, heavy set girl (advertised as MILF), read into it what you will, she’s nice enough, a Mom spirit pervades, not sure why the marriage relationship dissolved but it is the case…which is more than I need to know, some guys just want the sex, without the palpable emotional baggage….if the baggage doesn’t weigh you down, you’ll likely enjoy yourself, don’t expect anything lurid or cheap, she aims to please, but aims low… Click to expand... You mean she’s at least in her mid-50s? Hooker math 🧮—paying $500 to see someone in their 50s for an average experience is brutal. It’s really misleading when she posted that she’s 39. If you’re going to charge those prices, at least post your real age, or something close to it.

Roadtraveler said: You mean she’s at least in her mid-50s? Hooker math 🧮—paying $500 to see someone in their 50s for an average experience is brutal. It’s really misleading when she posted that she’s 39. If you’re going to charge those prices, at least post your real age, or something close to it. Click to expand... In defence of Camille, She is not over 50. Where did you see that.? I would say she is in her late 30s early 40s. Great body, gorgeous big boobs and pretty face.